Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 22:50:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5F5557CE17ECF572F8DDFC2A76D3B8F0FEFB7A0BF7B3FC3CF9C1ED677FF28F6D
Participant Details

Original Note:

חוות דעת במשפט פלילי הגיעה לטובת ההגנה. אז מה? חוו"ד של התביעה היא על ידי רופא שפועל לטובת התביעה. ולשים טוויט את בן כספית בתור מקור זה לא רציני.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821755477484503151
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5F5557CE17ECF572F8DDFC2A76D3B8F0FEFB7A0BF7B3FC3CF9C1ED677FF28F6D
  • createdAtMillis - 1723243833901
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18217554774845031515F5557CE17ECF572F8DDFC2A76D3B8F0FEFB7A0BF7B3FC3CF9C1ED677FF28F6D