Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 14:59:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 646243C1F324BF873F658DDF60A1D67C2282FC75580661AD472AD7C3D68A4F8F
Participant Details

Original Note:

šŸ”Ž Verificamos: Boulos repete uma argumentaĆ§Ć£o FALSA sobre seu voto como relator da investigaĆ§Ć£o contra o deputado federal Janones. No voto, ele defendeu o arquivamento da representaĆ§Ć£o alegando que se baseava em outro caso julgado pela ComissĆ£o de Ɖtica em 2014. Fonte: https://www.aosfatos.org/noticias/nunes-boulos-desinformacao-pre-campanha/#2

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821745768639721651
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 646243C1F324BF873F658DDF60A1D67C2282FC75580661AD472AD7C3D68A4F8F
  • createdAtMillis - 1723215577451
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1821745768639721651646243C1F324BF873F658DDF60A1D67C2282FC75580661AD472AD7C3D68A4F8F