Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 04:23:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E538220310FA716FF5E8C98725990598483845AF730371FD1D4CBCC90D06F433
Participant Details

Original Note:

Nnn a link to the persons twitter account is not evidence of how they work proffessionally. Currently the suggested note is no better than saying "no you" & doesnt refute cass being ideologically driven which is the key point of the tweet

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821744676992610676
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E538220310FA716FF5E8C98725990598483845AF730371FD1D4CBCC90D06F433
  • createdAtMillis - 1723177415697
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821744676992610676E538220310FA716FF5E8C98725990598483845AF730371FD1D4CBCC90D06F433