Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 05:03:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B36B43BEDBB52F234A85B126AB11135B5BB26C8C693E0DB7B56209378A56DE55
Participant Details

Original Note:

Nnn a link to the persons twitter account is not evidence of how they work proffessionally. Currently the suggested note is no better than saying "no you" & doesnt refute cass being ideologically driven which is the key point of the tweet

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821744676992610676
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B36B43BEDBB52F234A85B126AB11135B5BB26C8C693E0DB7B56209378A56DE55
  • createdAtMillis - 1723179781524
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821744676992610676B36B43BEDBB52F234A85B126AB11135B5BB26C8C693E0DB7B56209378A56DE55