Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 04:13:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2EF463C20F07773A92321AC4237AFF7EFD515320DFF32B4AD0D27FEF4D099584
Participant Details

Original Note:

Nnn a link to the persons twitter account is not evidence of how they work proffessionally. Currently the suggested note is no better than saying "no you" & doesnt refute cass being ideologically driven which is the key point of the tweet

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821744676992610676
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2EF463C20F07773A92321AC4237AFF7EFD515320DFF32B4AD0D27FEF4D099584
  • createdAtMillis - 1723176792929
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18217446769926106762EF463C20F07773A92321AC4237AFF7EFD515320DFF32B4AD0D27FEF4D099584