Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 02:27:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DB265D7BEF53801F5E207A60C277B78E52F1012DE3D8AA5FF8A915D5BEF267CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Multiple people who served under Walz confirmed there were only rumors the unit may deploy at the time he retired and that there were no official deployment or "warning orders" like the poster claims without any evidence. https://thehill.com/policy/defense/4818655-walz-veteran-service-record/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821710916423184566
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DB265D7BEF53801F5E207A60C277B78E52F1012DE3D8AA5FF8A915D5BEF267CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1723170478674
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821710916423184566DB265D7BEF53801F5E207A60C277B78E52F1012DE3D8AA5FF8A915D5BEF267CA