Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 09:51:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9059A90C66206F473DA2E2A4D0F54C27A793381A7B3F83927AE7DAAC631D9EC2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Multiple people who served under Walz confirmed there were only rumors the unit may deploy at the time he retired and that there were no official deployment or "warning orders" like the poster claims without any evidence. https://thehill.com/policy/defense/4818655-walz-veteran-service-record/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821710916423184566
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9059A90C66206F473DA2E2A4D0F54C27A793381A7B3F83927AE7DAAC631D9EC2
  • createdAtMillis - 1723197083356
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18217109164231845669059A90C66206F473DA2E2A4D0F54C27A793381A7B3F83927AE7DAAC631D9EC2