Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 05:25:16 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ED134BD044E4193618BDBD74C36DD3F05563D63E15707AC6CC9133AFBD15C967
Participant Details

Original Note:

The "period passport" has already been debunked. https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/project-2025-did-not-propose-period-passport-women-2024-07-16/ https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.363Q8MR

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821701707312853290
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ED134BD044E4193618BDBD74C36DD3F05563D63E15707AC6CC9133AFBD15C967
  • createdAtMillis - 1723181116058
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821701707312853290ED134BD044E4193618BDBD74C36DD3F05563D63E15707AC6CC9133AFBD15C967