Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 00:17:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3E83F10C6B61A1A019D1786C5F3D0D923A929E4A6D0A1C42A34708B690B0C9B0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The "period passport" has already been debunked. https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/project-2025-did-not-propose-period-passport-women-2024-07-16/ https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.363Q8MR

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821701707312853290
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3E83F10C6B61A1A019D1786C5F3D0D923A929E4A6D0A1C42A34708B690B0C9B0
  • createdAtMillis - 1723162632845
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18217017073128532903E83F10C6B61A1A019D1786C5F3D0D923A929E4A6D0A1C42A34708B690B0C9B0