Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 08:27:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 35C681E320A15E43E3BA8B5E6F86CFA0C95F57D9B131B223619589AEF27A96AE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The "period passport" has already been debunked. https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/project-2025-did-not-propose-period-passport-women-2024-07-16/ https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.363Q8MR

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821701707312853290
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 35C681E320A15E43E3BA8B5E6F86CFA0C95F57D9B131B223619589AEF27A96AE
  • createdAtMillis - 1723192057222
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 182170170731285329035C681E320A15E43E3BA8B5E6F86CFA0C95F57D9B131B223619589AEF27A96AE