Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 02:29:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 94A0ACCBCD4654D86939DF3FFE4381C892F6E5C340E6EA232394AF38C6F18F11
Participant Details

Original Note:

"Without evidence" means Vance is accusing Walz without providing proof. It doesn't imply that no evidence exists, just that Vance hasn't presented any to support his claim. https://cmsimpact.org/code/set-principles-fair-use-journalism/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821699251874955283
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 94A0ACCBCD4654D86939DF3FFE4381C892F6E5C340E6EA232394AF38C6F18F11
  • createdAtMillis - 1723170564357
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182169925187495528394A0ACCBCD4654D86939DF3FFE4381C892F6E5C340E6EA232394AF38C6F18F11