Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 21:09:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D8479F8965404C9922E7FFD29CE47DD25BB06FF7793FB33F4865C920FA3BEA26
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Note by Resplendent Cedar Osprey misses key points and presents no evidence to counter that ineligible voters were on the voter rolls. Dismissed lawsuits prove nothing. Fact checking opinions violates CN values. https://x.com/i/communitynotes/u/resplendent-cedar-osprey https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/en/contributing/values

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821627787905839269
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D8479F8965404C9922E7FFD29CE47DD25BB06FF7793FB33F4865C920FA3BEA26
  • createdAtMillis - 1723151388602
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821627787905839269D8479F8965404C9922E7FFD29CE47DD25BB06FF7793FB33F4865C920FA3BEA26