Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 13:55:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6C955C43E61668617950265EA9114F83E9C26089467D4FF89DF2D977A2BB07B6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Note by Resplendent Cedar Osprey misses key points and presents no evidence to counter that ineligible voters were on the voter rolls. Dismissed lawsuits prove nothing. Fact checking opinions violates CN values. https://x.com/i/communitynotes/u/resplendent-cedar-osprey https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/en/contributing/values

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821627787905839269
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6C955C43E61668617950265EA9114F83E9C26089467D4FF89DF2D977A2BB07B6
  • createdAtMillis - 1723211715488
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18216277879058392696C955C43E61668617950265EA9114F83E9C26089467D4FF89DF2D977A2BB07B6