Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 10:43:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8B9498D5951AEAF1A50AA9BA27AA087695CC3002177DA7DC139F5F136CA1FDA5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Scientific American is a popular science digest, not a scientific journal practicing peer review. The linked article qualifies at most as a comment or opinion piece. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_American

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821601722894041282
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8B9498D5951AEAF1A50AA9BA27AA087695CC3002177DA7DC139F5F136CA1FDA5
  • createdAtMillis - 1723200222453
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18216017228940412828B9498D5951AEAF1A50AA9BA27AA087695CC3002177DA7DC139F5F136CA1FDA5