Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 23:52:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 80CF9AAD9C9BFEFDC633C2E03D1FDB88EA76A1EC51326AA8C302C9ED14DE3640
Participant Details

Original Note:

Scientific American is a popular science digest, not a scientific journal practicing peer review. The linked article qualifies at most as a comment or opinion piece. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_American

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821601722894041282
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 80CF9AAD9C9BFEFDC633C2E03D1FDB88EA76A1EC51326AA8C302C9ED14DE3640
  • createdAtMillis - 1723161150099
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 182160172289404128280CF9AAD9C9BFEFDC633C2E03D1FDB88EA76A1EC51326AA8C302C9ED14DE3640