Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 17:53:43 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AE510FECFC71F3E7D7E75E052629EAA306B56E639CD1D5E301DC9F328A04185F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The post is factually accurate. The note referring to the microphone incident is deliberately misleading and vexatious. There has been no serious suggestion that this was a case of criminal damage. https://www.independent.co.uk/tv/news/london-met-police-riot-journalist-microphone-b2592799.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821552618788852109
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AE510FECFC71F3E7D7E75E052629EAA306B56E639CD1D5E301DC9F328A04185F
  • createdAtMillis - 1723139623902
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821552618788852109AE510FECFC71F3E7D7E75E052629EAA306B56E639CD1D5E301DC9F328A04185F