Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 22:00:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CDE2A3F6B4B4FF304406BB833C5878D6C7AA95BD1E0D5EE36B4E03C65F62449D
Participant Details

Original Note:

This article was never posted and is factually untrue https://x.com/telegraph/status/1821486736037355830?s=46&t=_QadBB27vUeaRdcikjSoOA

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821536712767476068
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CDE2A3F6B4B4FF304406BB833C5878D6C7AA95BD1E0D5EE36B4E03C65F62449D
  • createdAtMillis - 1723154401911
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821536712767476068CDE2A3F6B4B4FF304406BB833C5878D6C7AA95BD1E0D5EE36B4E03C65F62449D