Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 00:59:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C46E3356D0746CAD5AC075F443579D61C8E0CDA6076347C72DE4C99D02941114
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The Cass review has not been peer reviewed, at all. It's purely an opinion piece, by a non-expert (no experience in the field of trans healthcare), the post highlights that actual expert reviews of Cass are all critical of it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821526577856774344
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C46E3356D0746CAD5AC075F443579D61C8E0CDA6076347C72DE4C99D02941114
  • createdAtMillis - 1723165180335
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821526577856774344C46E3356D0746CAD5AC075F443579D61C8E0CDA6076347C72DE4C99D02941114