Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 15:38:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A06B5AD46B03701EF43FB04C558CDC0992AAEB06F08262946CC30F2C94E14FD6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The Cass review has not been peer reviewed, at all. It's purely an opinion piece, by a non-expert (no experience in the field of trans healthcare), the post highlights that actual expert reviews of Cass are all critical of it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821526577856774344
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A06B5AD46B03701EF43FB04C558CDC0992AAEB06F08262946CC30F2C94E14FD6
  • createdAtMillis - 1723131503607
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821526577856774344A06B5AD46B03701EF43FB04C558CDC0992AAEB06F08262946CC30F2C94E14FD6