Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 18:00:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CF6764C2CFBA6A2CEB0E325E7761F917BCA4D0485EDD8FEBCB498F30EB85784C
Participant Details

Original Note:

At the time, yes. Facebook concluded their algorithim was in error because it was "race-blind" and was detecting what Facebook considered to be less harmful content like "men are pigs". The article heading stems from a 2021 Washington Post article. https://web.archive.org/web/20221107135503/https://en-volve.com/2021/12/04/facebooks-race-blind-algorithm-backfires-in-their-face-finds-90-of-hate-speech-was-directed-toward-white-people-and-men/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/11/21/facebook-algorithm-biased-race/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821524151733047608
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CF6764C2CFBA6A2CEB0E325E7761F917BCA4D0485EDD8FEBCB498F30EB85784C
  • createdAtMillis - 1723226453005
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821524151733047608CF6764C2CFBA6A2CEB0E325E7761F917BCA4D0485EDD8FEBCB498F30EB85784C