Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 23:54:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9FF0B1C783D39877547A526AF6F78FE9A0BCC95B102478C9FF76CAF12AB76C65
Participant Details

Original Note:

A meta-análise citada não suporta a conclusão que o uso da Hidroxicloroquina (HCQ) foi benéfico no tratamento da Covid-19, ela apenas aponta que os ensaios clínicos randomizados não continuaram por tempo suficiente para rejeitar a hipótese nula. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10654-022-00891-4.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821515514805354783
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9FF0B1C783D39877547A526AF6F78FE9A0BCC95B102478C9FF76CAF12AB76C65
  • createdAtMillis - 1723161269801
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18215155148053547839FF0B1C783D39877547A526AF6F78FE9A0BCC95B102478C9FF76CAF12AB76C65