Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 13:20:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2ED7D05BAA416E3766FCDEB7F2EEACFDC38CB1853081CE598987851E2CBE47D8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cass Review is a peer review by a medical committee which took many years. It is impossible for it to have been "peer reviewed and debunked" in the space of two months as there simply hasn't been enough time. For context, the Cass Review was medical, not ideological. https://physiciansthrive.com/medical-peer-review/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821510252061196634
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2ED7D05BAA416E3766FCDEB7F2EEACFDC38CB1853081CE598987851E2CBE47D8
  • createdAtMillis - 1723123223192
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18215102520611966342ED7D05BAA416E3766FCDEB7F2EEACFDC38CB1853081CE598987851E2CBE47D8