Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 18:10:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ADFF8D258C8404EE608F86B2BB34717C0C0CB514AECB3A357FE699C8ECDBF13E
Participant Details

Original Note:

記事は「著作権者の同意なく画像を機械学習に使用した」ことを認めるものですが、その行為が必ずしも「著作権侵害」となるわけではない事に注意が必要です。 実際、これに関連したアーティストによる著作権訴訟では、その訴えが棄却されています。 https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/judge-pares-down-artists-ai-copyright-lawsuit-against-midjourney-stability-ai-2023-10-30/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821496734411018517
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ADFF8D258C8404EE608F86B2BB34717C0C0CB514AECB3A357FE699C8ECDBF13E
  • createdAtMillis - 1723140632229
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821496734411018517ADFF8D258C8404EE608F86B2BB34717C0C0CB514AECB3A357FE699C8ECDBF13E