Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 20:55:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 939CF9C40D17C026CFECD2E81AD2BF04E2E177B97233E0BA5CBD3C36E28FA581
Participant Details

Original Note:

記事は「著作権者の同意なく画像を機械学習に使用した」ことを認めるものですが、その行為が必ずしも「著作権侵害」となるわけではない事に注意が必要です。 実際、これに関連したアーティストによる著作権訴訟では、その訴えが棄却されています。 https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/judge-pares-down-artists-ai-copyright-lawsuit-against-midjourney-stability-ai-2023-10-30/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821496734411018517
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 939CF9C40D17C026CFECD2E81AD2BF04E2E177B97233E0BA5CBD3C36E28FA581
  • createdAtMillis - 1723150530266
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1821496734411018517939CF9C40D17C026CFECD2E81AD2BF04E2E177B97233E0BA5CBD3C36E28FA581