Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 10:15:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C05DB5FD4B74A031EE7A4C342025F29FDD7C61B52EBB3F4E90816D00E6E805C3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Courts are not uniformly receptive to expert testimony about ASD, special challenges that confront such individuals, and whether the disorder warrants the use of diminished capacity to relieve the actor of culpability or reduce the charge or sentence. https://www.purdueglobal.edu/blog/criminal-justice/autism-and-the-criminal-justice-system/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821474049920250223
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C05DB5FD4B74A031EE7A4C342025F29FDD7C61B52EBB3F4E90816D00E6E805C3
  • createdAtMillis - 1723112111564
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821474049920250223C05DB5FD4B74A031EE7A4C342025F29FDD7C61B52EBB3F4E90816D00E6E805C3