Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 09:29:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AFA15EE101746A3A4DA774D14BFEDA42EA25C2B9871B1C59C061061275CE5E56
Participant Details

Original Note:

This story does not exist. It is framed as a Telegraph story to make it appear real. https://www.telegraph.co.uk

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821472963083857957
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AFA15EE101746A3A4DA774D14BFEDA42EA25C2B9871B1C59C061061275CE5E56
  • createdAtMillis - 1723109396909
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821472963083857957AFA15EE101746A3A4DA774D14BFEDA42EA25C2B9871B1C59C061061275CE5E56