Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 11:09:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F3BFFD649A0D7C2B6CFCE26276C3222C1D72BE1321718F2661209C8A194A859C
Participant Details

Original Note:

ポスト中に「学術的には証明されていないらしいが」とポスト者自身の憶測であると認識できるような文言が確認できるため、このポストは誤解を招く可能性は低いです。 よってこのノートは不要となります。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821462938227757138
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F3BFFD649A0D7C2B6CFCE26276C3222C1D72BE1321718F2661209C8A194A859C
  • createdAtMillis - 1723115396961
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821462938227757138F3BFFD649A0D7C2B6CFCE26276C3222C1D72BE1321718F2661209C8A194A859C