Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 11:46:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E3A67975C8E0CAF1553430E7A441983EE91F6822D506E60C57C92C14416B4E92
Participant Details

Original Note:

ポスト中に「学術的には証明されていないらしいが」とポスト者自身の憶測であると認識できるような文言が確認できるため、このポストは誤解を招く可能性は低いです。 よってこのノートは不要となります。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821462938227757138
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E3A67975C8E0CAF1553430E7A441983EE91F6822D506E60C57C92C14416B4E92
  • createdAtMillis - 1723117581864
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821462938227757138E3A67975C8E0CAF1553430E7A441983EE91F6822D506E60C57C92C14416B4E92