Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 10:35:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 81B1DE98DCF51A4AFDB64F6B051851DEE8E6A21C7391D2C411E7136D4431B270
Participant Details

Original Note:

ポスト中に「学術的には証明されていないらしいが」とポスト者自身の憶測であると認識できるような文言が確認できるため、このポストは誤解を招く可能性は低いです。 よってこのノートは不要となります。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821462938227757138
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 81B1DE98DCF51A4AFDB64F6B051851DEE8E6A21C7391D2C411E7136D4431B270
  • createdAtMillis - 1723113341937
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182146293822775713881B1DE98DCF51A4AFDB64F6B051851DEE8E6A21C7391D2C411E7136D4431B270