Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 08:59:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E98E9E165140EB6E2B43243FD05CC1001AEF5798CC5791B1C3570AAD15BF907
Participant Details

Original Note:

ポスト中に「学術的には証明されていないらしいが」とポスト者自身の憶測であると認識できるような文言が確認できるため、このポストは誤解を招く可能性は低いです。 よってこのノートは不要となります。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821462938227757138
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E98E9E165140EB6E2B43243FD05CC1001AEF5798CC5791B1C3570AAD15BF907
  • createdAtMillis - 1723107582554
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18214629382277571384E98E9E165140EB6E2B43243FD05CC1001AEF5798CC5791B1C3570AAD15BF907