Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 14:28:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F07F48083A26E7920CF8CDBB1E25AD853CA8E3F1BDD8589A9E905FCA0C498653
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no “confirmation” or proof that the email has been “leaked” and not directly sent to the media page as a PR move. Also no proof has been provided of the legitimacy of the email. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/PR

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821374327763111976
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F07F48083A26E7920CF8CDBB1E25AD853CA8E3F1BDD8589A9E905FCA0C498653
  • createdAtMillis - 1723127317726
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1821374327763111976F07F48083A26E7920CF8CDBB1E25AD853CA8E3F1BDD8589A9E905FCA0C498653