Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 01:28:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3E51F8F1B077541A780FD721FAFDE69168122C6111CF487B6D4A3FC36EBAE61D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The NY post article uses a paid endorsement and one persons view on it who was paid to write it. Others have been quoted who served with walz defending him. https://www.kare11.com/article/news/verify/verify-questions-raised-about-walzs-military-record/89-982ae672-808a-453f-8b55-d9d26cb42e0d

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821342174794969525
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3E51F8F1B077541A780FD721FAFDE69168122C6111CF487B6D4A3FC36EBAE61D
  • createdAtMillis - 1723080527857
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18213421747949695253E51F8F1B077541A780FD721FAFDE69168122C6111CF487B6D4A3FC36EBAE61D