Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 16:47:00 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 38A996A8E5DC76B370BB45B14D784523BC90AF64158E8751BBEB6EDBA6E057E2
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The NY post article uses a paid endorsement and one persons view on it who was paid to write it. Others have been quoted who served with walz defending him. https://www.kare11.com/article/news/verify/verify-questions-raised-about-walzs-military-record/89-982ae672-808a-453f-8b55-d9d26cb42e0d

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1821342174794969525
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 38A996A8E5DC76B370BB45B14D784523BC90AF64158E8751BBEB6EDBA6E057E2
createdAtMillis - 1723135620665
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 1
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 1
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 182134217479496952538A996A8E5DC76B370BB45B14D784523BC90AF64158E8751BBEB6EDBA6E057E2