Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 22:00:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D884A6465B1C4CFE18E4579A4FF91DB2630E8A2FF50CB18D8FF21E49E5B2BF03
Participant Details

Original Note:

O veto foi motivado por não haver estimativa de impacto orçamentário e também porque os atletas já estavam cobertos pelo auxílio emergencial da Lei nº 13.982/2020. O veto foi mantido posteriormente, inclusive com votos de parlamentares de oposição ao Governo Bolsonaro. https://www2.camara.leg.br/legin/fed/lei/2020/lei-14073-14-outubro-2020-790727-veto-161661-pl.html https://www.congressonacional.leg.br/materias/vetos/-/veto/detalhe/13786/1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821304110164946958
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D884A6465B1C4CFE18E4579A4FF91DB2630E8A2FF50CB18D8FF21E49E5B2BF03
  • createdAtMillis - 1723068038935
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821304110164946958D884A6465B1C4CFE18E4579A4FF91DB2630E8A2FF50CB18D8FF21E49E5B2BF03