Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 00:06:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BD285C8E21D2A9ED59F1AD15E2E285BC9589B97F0CA8F16600DA0F68407783CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

O veto foi motivado por não haver estimativa de impacto orçamentário e também porque os atletas já estavam cobertos pelo auxílio emergencial da Lei nº 13.982/2020. O veto foi mantido posteriormente, inclusive com votos de parlamentares de oposição ao Governo Bolsonaro. https://www2.camara.leg.br/legin/fed/lei/2020/lei-14073-14-outubro-2020-790727-veto-161661-pl.html https://www.congressonacional.leg.br/materias/vetos/-/veto/detalhe/13786/1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821304110164946958
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BD285C8E21D2A9ED59F1AD15E2E285BC9589B97F0CA8F16600DA0F68407783CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1723075586736
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821304110164946958BD285C8E21D2A9ED59F1AD15E2E285BC9589B97F0CA8F16600DA0F68407783CA