Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 23:33:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71D8DA6EACC650BC0247BC564FAE07DB8C996F65A16A27B615C507BF859CF531
Participant Details

Original Note:

Walz was administrative demoted for not completing the requirements to keep his rank prior to retiring. Demotions are not exclusive to misconduct and one of the proposed notes mentions performance, which this falls under. Paragraph 6-22,c(2) addresses his demotion situation: https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN40051-AR_600-8-19-000-WEB-1.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1821301955571962158
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 71D8DA6EACC650BC0247BC564FAE07DB8C996F65A16A27B615C507BF859CF531
createdAtMillis - 1723073633196
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 182130195557196215871D8DA6EACC650BC0247BC564FAE07DB8C996F65A16A27B615C507BF859CF531