Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 06:18:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B57D7B1C4F85D8307222E746776E8C64495C7E00917D8C04796B6F4CA36143EB
Participant Details

Original Note:

nope, this is according to German law, regardless of the incident. According to Section 22 of the KunstUrhG (law concerning copyright in works of fine art and photography), images may only be distributed or publicly displayed with the consent of the person depicted. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/kunsturhg/__22.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1821300667736297660
participantId -
raterParticipantId - B57D7B1C4F85D8307222E746776E8C64495C7E00917D8C04796B6F4CA36143EB
createdAtMillis - 1723097893048
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1821300667736297660B57D7B1C4F85D8307222E746776E8C64495C7E00917D8C04796B6F4CA36143EB