Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 00:50:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5D87CD279F5061B96C5B1A5E48A7526887C16FB873E054BDBD1F5FE651E23864
Participant Details

Original Note:

nope, this is according to German law, regardless of the incident. According to Section 22 of the KunstUrhG (law concerning copyright in works of fine art and photography), images may only be distributed or publicly displayed with the consent of the person depicted. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/kunsturhg/__22.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821300667736297660
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5D87CD279F5061B96C5B1A5E48A7526887C16FB873E054BDBD1F5FE651E23864
  • createdAtMillis - 1723078235220
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18213006677362976605D87CD279F5061B96C5B1A5E48A7526887C16FB873E054BDBD1F5FE651E23864