Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 08:04:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 415C0059B3D695493C4654FC2CE5A5FD13DC66D4F9633790B0E5793E7AC43CEB
Participant Details

Original Note:

nope, this is according to German law, regardless of the incident. According to Section 22 of the KunstUrhG (law concerning copyright in works of fine art and photography), images may only be distributed or publicly displayed with the consent of the person depicted. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/kunsturhg/__22.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1821300667736297660
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 415C0059B3D695493C4654FC2CE5A5FD13DC66D4F9633790B0E5793E7AC43CEB
createdAtMillis - 1723104259610
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1821300667736297660415C0059B3D695493C4654FC2CE5A5FD13DC66D4F9633790B0E5793E7AC43CEB