Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 02:34:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 37DFC2AC2488876AA56F674DF0BD17B1F2D1D2DE8A243F9E227C5FAEA949BA2B
Participant Details

Original Note:

nope, this is according to German law, regardless of the incident. According to Section 22 of the KunstUrhG (law concerning copyright in works of fine art and photography), images may only be distributed or publicly displayed with the consent of the person depicted. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/kunsturhg/__22.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1821300667736297660
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 37DFC2AC2488876AA56F674DF0BD17B1F2D1D2DE8A243F9E227C5FAEA949BA2B
createdAtMillis - 1723084493888
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 182130066773629766037DFC2AC2488876AA56F674DF0BD17B1F2D1D2DE8A243F9E227C5FAEA949BA2B