Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 03:23:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 253D26D0CB9088CC5B4E77DB5D48BDE0037D1AC95A9354FED0A18AE8B59B6AA1
Participant Details

Original Note:

nope, this is according to German law, regardless of the incident. According to Section 22 of the KunstUrhG (law concerning copyright in works of fine art and photography), images may only be distributed or publicly displayed with the consent of the person depicted. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/kunsturhg/__22.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1821300667736297660
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 253D26D0CB9088CC5B4E77DB5D48BDE0037D1AC95A9354FED0A18AE8B59B6AA1
createdAtMillis - 1723087400240
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1821300667736297660253D26D0CB9088CC5B4E77DB5D48BDE0037D1AC95A9354FED0A18AE8B59B6AA1