Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 04:16:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E98B3588E7D9C5654C6C5B0CAF1F0A307E8BC995FCD6FF609E7E9DEB7618B7B
Participant Details

Original Note:

nope, this is according to German law, regardless of the incident. According to Section 22 of the KunstUrhG (law concerning copyright in works of fine art and photography), images may only be distributed or publicly displayed with the consent of the person depicted. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/kunsturhg/__22.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1821300667736297660
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 0E98B3588E7D9C5654C6C5B0CAF1F0A307E8BC995FCD6FF609E7E9DEB7618B7B
createdAtMillis - 1723090613686
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 18213006677362976600E98B3588E7D9C5654C6C5B0CAF1F0A307E8BC995FCD6FF609E7E9DEB7618B7B