Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 21:41:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DA71B555585F7F629CF715B0F360740578BEEECC39D938391B0103C22CBFDDA1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il post non riporta fonti. Si potrebbe riferire a uno studio canadese, non sottoposto a peer-review, che documenta una correlazione e non un effetto di causalità. Manca pertanto evidenza scientifica a sostegno di quanto affermato nel post. https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.33XF3CN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821297695711228238
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DA71B555585F7F629CF715B0F360740578BEEECC39D938391B0103C22CBFDDA1
  • createdAtMillis - 1723066860667
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821297695711228238DA71B555585F7F629CF715B0F360740578BEEECC39D938391B0103C22CBFDDA1