Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 22:33:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5F8E8C2E85F7FFCCBAF03DAA956CF12D5D3FCD4821F924B2BAEC4530700C894A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il post non riporta fonti. Si potrebbe riferire a uno studio canadese, non sottoposto a peer-review, che documenta una correlazione e non un effetto di causalità. Manca pertanto evidenza scientifica a sostegno di quanto affermato nel post. https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.33XF3CN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821297695711228238
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5F8E8C2E85F7FFCCBAF03DAA956CF12D5D3FCD4821F924B2BAEC4530700C894A
  • createdAtMillis - 1723156434643
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18212976957112282385F8E8C2E85F7FFCCBAF03DAA956CF12D5D3FCD4821F924B2BAEC4530700C894A