Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 11:44:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9FE7D6EE6C57C2A92CCC6DDE204000A4ADB08F76A393F39ADD603464EE94D296
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet is factually correct and the proposed note does not even contradict it. Replies and quote tweets are available to add this kind of additional information, but it simply doesn’t require a CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821274963036209509
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9FE7D6EE6C57C2A92CCC6DDE204000A4ADB08F76A393F39ADD603464EE94D296
  • createdAtMillis - 1723117490523
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18212749630362095099FE7D6EE6C57C2A92CCC6DDE204000A4ADB08F76A393F39ADD603464EE94D296