Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 03:25:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9149B053E2A35CF796C5C9A9107C4E8B4EA6512F4A208A181A0FD84B1460E4FC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet is factually correct and the proposed note does not even contradict it. Replies and quote tweets are available to add this kind of additional information, but it simply doesn’t require a CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821274963036209509
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9149B053E2A35CF796C5C9A9107C4E8B4EA6512F4A208A181A0FD84B1460E4FC
  • createdAtMillis - 1723087540105
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18212749630362095099149B053E2A35CF796C5C9A9107C4E8B4EA6512F4A208A181A0FD84B1460E4FC