Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 20:19:34 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5A976F37BA7A033EE1801EC0B32EF2912D57DAF559F9801F4A0E6495FB9CC9C4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet is factually correct and the proposed note does not even contradict it. Replies and quote tweets are available to add this kind of additional information, but it simply doesn’t require a CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821274963036209509
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5A976F37BA7A033EE1801EC0B32EF2912D57DAF559F9801F4A0E6495FB9CC9C4
  • createdAtMillis - 1723061974394
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18212749630362095095A976F37BA7A033EE1801EC0B32EF2912D57DAF559F9801F4A0E6495FB9CC9C4