Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 01:16:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3D2B5E7FC1316538E27B4CC0B51B92A9C90A35E0D77EE15D9D6A821BC4E4F65B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet is factually correct and the proposed note does not even contradict it. Replies and quote tweets are available to add this kind of additional information, but it simply doesn’t require a CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821274963036209509
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3D2B5E7FC1316538E27B4CC0B51B92A9C90A35E0D77EE15D9D6A821BC4E4F65B
  • createdAtMillis - 1723079786808
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18212749630362095093D2B5E7FC1316538E27B4CC0B51B92A9C90A35E0D77EE15D9D6A821BC4E4F65B