Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 23:29:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2C7A1922743E9FFEB0F46585864A11F8B0CD041D0F6DAF19D6BACA0BB0B34500
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet is factually correct and the proposed note does not even contradict it. Replies and quote tweets are available to add this kind of additional information, but it simply doesn’t require a CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821274963036209509
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2C7A1922743E9FFEB0F46585864A11F8B0CD041D0F6DAF19D6BACA0BB0B34500
  • createdAtMillis - 1723073340196
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18212749630362095092C7A1922743E9FFEB0F46585864A11F8B0CD041D0F6DAF19D6BACA0BB0B34500