Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 12:35:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 297AF9C478A95EDDE812496EE56867C617D4E7415510EF3548707B41F330AE33
Participant Details

Original Note:

He didn't claim they called his appearance weird, so there's no need to try an refute that claim as it wasn't made.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821268060445274173
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 297AF9C478A95EDDE812496EE56867C617D4E7415510EF3548707B41F330AE33
  • createdAtMillis - 1723120548165
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821268060445274173297AF9C478A95EDDE812496EE56867C617D4E7415510EF3548707B41F330AE33